Back to Blog
Service pages

Outsourcing Link Building with GEO in Mind: Does It Still Work?

By

Juul van Dongen

11 min readEnglish
Table of Contents

At a glance

Hiring an agency to handle link building can still improve your position in traditional Google search results, because Google continues to use backlinks as an authority signal. Visibility in AI generated answers from ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google's AI Overviews works differently. These systems select and cite content based on clear facts, structure, and authority within the page itself, rather than primarily on the number of referring domains. So, if you outsource link building assuming it will automatically improve AI visibility too, you are relying on a correlation that is weaker in practice than it may seem. Both channels need their own strategy, and some of the budget currently spent on link building may deliver better ROI when redirected towards content structure and GEO optimization.

Outsourcing Link Building with GEO in Mind: Does It Still Work? - Professional photography
Outsourcing Link Building with GEO in Mind: Does It Still Work? - Professional photography

Key takeaways

  • Link building remains relevant for traditional Google rankings, but Google treats purchased or exchanged links as spam. According to Google Search Console Help, "buying or selling links for ranking purposes" violates its spam policies, whether it happens through a link building agency or not.
  • AI Overviews appeared in more than 60% of all US searches for the first time in November 2025, double the share recorded in August 2024, according to Xponent21.
  • Specific content improvements can increase visibility in generative AI answers by up to 40%, according to research from Princeton University and others (KDD '24), independently of backlink volume.
  • AI summaries can reduce publisher click throughs by up to 80%, according to Authoritas research cited by Tech Policy Press. This makes citations more important than traditional clicks.
  • Only 43% of AI Overviews link back to organic Google results, according to an analysis of more than 141.000 AI Overviews by SE Ranking. In other words, link based authority is less visibly rewarded than it is in traditional SEO.

Hiring a link building agency can seem like the obvious move when your in house content engine has stalled. Writing takes time, outreach takes even more, and an external team promises results without tying up your team for days at a time. For traditional Google rankings, there is some truth to that. Backlinks from relevant, high authority domains still influence how Google assesses a site's authority.

The problem starts when a marketer assumes the same investment will also create visibility in ChatGPT or Perplexity. That is a different game with different rules. Google ranks a page in a list of blue links. An AI model assembles an answer from snippets of text, often without generating a click for the source at all. Ranking third in Google and being cited in an AI answer are two distinct outcomes, even when they stem from the same search query.

More agencies are adding "AI visibility" to their link building packages, often without materially changing how they work. Ask the right question: is the content surrounding those links also optimized for extraction by a language model, or is it the same outreach process with a new label? That distinction determines whether the budget is being spent wisely.

How does authority work differently in Google and AI answers?

In traditional SEO, a backlink acts like a vote of confidence. Site A links to site B, and Google can treat that as a trust signal. The model dates back to PageRank and remains part of Google's ranking systems, even though it is only one of dozens of signals.

A generative AI model does not use a link graph in the same way. It builds an answer from training data and, in systems with live retrieval such as Perplexity or Google's AI Overviews, from a limited set of documents that appear relevant at that moment. Whether those documents are selected has more to do with how clearly a page presents a fact, definition, or figure than with how many websites link to it.

Research from Princeton University and its partners supports this. Specific textual changes, including adding statistics, quotes, and clear structure, increased visibility in generative search results by up to 40%. The study did not identify a link profile as the main lever. That does not mean authority no longer matters. It means the route to authority is different: recognizable expertise on the page itself, rather than an external network of referring domains.

Google has recognized this issue in traditional search for a long time. Its spam policies explicitly state that buying or selling links to manipulate rankings is a violation. That also applies when a third party link building service handles the transaction. A manual action for unnatural links can set a site back for months, both in traditional results and indirectly in the sources AI systems may later rely on.

What should marketers do to appear in AI answers?

Imagine a business to business service provider that has invested consistently in link building for five years, earning a healthy first page Google ranking for its most important search term. That same query now triggers an AI Overview above the organic results in more than 60% of cases, a trend Xponent21 documented in the US market. If the AI Overview does not mention the company, visible traffic can decline even when its traditional ranking remains unchanged. Authoritas research, cited by Tech Policy Press, shows that AI summaries can reduce click throughs by up to 80%. A strong Google position still matters, but it is no longer the traffic guarantee it once was.

What works is content that looks authoritative to both Google and AI models: direct answers early in the copy, statistics with sources, clear definitions, and a structure that a model can cite without losing context. This applies to service pages as much as blog posts. Many businesses miss the opportunity on their service pages because those pages are written to sell, but do not offer the direct answers, pricing guidance, or clear process an AI assistant can use. If you want to address that, you can improve your service pages so they meet both a visitor's buying intent and an AI model's need for citable information. A broader approach to service pages is covered in this overview of what most businesses get wrong.

Here is how to approach it:

  • Check whether an AI Overview already appears for each important search term, and assess whether your brand is mentioned.
  • Rewrite your top five content pages with a direct answer in the opening paragraph, followed by supporting evidence.
  • Add a source to every statistic or claim so a model can recognize the information as verifiable.
  • Shift part of your link building budget towards ongoing content improvements if your current link profile is already healthy.
  • Track mentions in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews every month, separately from traditional ranking positions.

The biggest risk is not that link building does nothing. It is that it becomes the priority while the real problem lies elsewhere. Here are some common pitfalls:

Link packages with no relevance checks. Some agencies place links on domains with little topical relevance. This may create a short term ranking lift, but it increases the risk of a manual action under Google's spam policies.

No distinction between click traffic and citation traffic. A company focused only on traditional positions may overlook the fact that 57% of AI Overviews, according to SE Ranking, do not link back to organic results at all. In these cases, you win or lose on citations, not clicks.

Content written for search engines, not readers or models. Copy built mainly to house anchor text and links often lacks the concrete facts and clear structure a language model needs to cite it.

No AI visibility tracking alongside Google positions. If you only check Search Console, you are seeing only part of the picture. Visibility across multiple AI assistants requires separate measurement, beyond a conventional link report.

Regulation that changes the landscape. On 9 December 2025, the European Commission opened a formal investigation into whether Google treats publishers unfairly when using their content for AI Overviews, without appropriate compensation or a meaningful opt out. The outcome could eventually affect how content is retrieved and compensated, which matters to any company investing in content over the long term.

Best Practices Checklist for Marketing and SEO:

  • Check the health of your link profile first: an audit will show whether additional links still add value or whether returns are declining.
  • Keep your link building budget separate from your content quality budget: the two channels require different expertise and produce different outcomes.
  • Ask every link building agency about its approach to AI visibility: a vague answer is a sign that the service is still just outreach.
  • Restructure existing content pages with direct answers at the top: this can materially increase the chance of being cited in AI responses, as supported by Princeton University and others.
  • Measure visibility in at least three AI assistants alongside Google Search Console: one source can create a distorted view of what is working.
  • Build hub and spoke content clusters instead of isolated articles: related pages reinforce each other's authority without requiring an external link.
  • Refresh outdated pages rather than only publishing new content: old statistics and examples weaken a page's ability to be cited.
  • Consider a tool such as Launchmind that automatically improves content using real Search Console data: this helps prevent budget from flowing into channels that are demonstrably no longer delivering results.

Frequently asked questions

Yes. A healthy, relevant link profile remains part of how Google evaluates authority, provided the links are earned naturally and are topically relevant. Purchased or exchanged links intended to manipulate rankings, however, violate Google's spam policies and can result in a manual action.

Why does a strong Google ranking not automatically earn a mention in ChatGPT?

AI models select content based on recognizable facts, structure, and authority within the text itself, not primarily on the number of referring domains. Research from Princeton University and others shows that focused content improvements can increase visibility in generative answers by up to 40%, regardless of the link profile.

How much traffic can an AI Overview cost a company focused only on traditional SEO?

Authoritas research, cited by Tech Policy Press, points to click through declines of up to 80% from AI summaries. The exact loss varies by industry and keyword, but the trend is clear: fewer clicks despite an unchanged ranking.

A complete shift is rarely the right move because traditional Google rankings still account for a substantial share of traffic. A gradual reallocation, moving part of the budget towards content structure and citable content once the link profile is healthy, usually delivers better ROI than an all or nothing decision.

Launchmind writes, reviews, and publishes SEO content every day on a company's own blog, in 8 languages. It continuously adjusts based on real Search Console data rather than guesswork. Alex also improves service pages with direct answers, pricing guidance, and evidence drawn from real customer questions. Every page is measured in Google and five AI assistants, making it clear where link building falls short and where content structure makes the difference.

Conclusion

Outsourcing link building is not a wasted investment, but it is no longer a universal solution. It can still support traditional Google rankings when it follows Google's rules, but it does not automatically align with how AI models select content for their answers. Businesses that want to perform consistently, both in blue links and in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews, need to take content structure and citability as seriously as their link profile. It starts with an honest audit of what is working and what is simply consuming budget without measurable results. Want to see where your content and service pages currently stand in Google and the leading AI assistants? Book a free consultation to discover which shift will make the biggest difference.

About the company

Launchmind is the AI colleague that writes, reviews, and publishes SEO content every day on a company's own blog, in 8 languages. It continuously adjusts based on real Search Console data. Alex also improves service pages with direct answers, pricing guidance, process details, and evidence from genuine customer questions. Each page is measured in Google and five AI assistants. Launchmind is built for marketing managers, business owners, and chief marketing officers at small and medium sized businesses and scaleups that know content works but struggle to produce it consistently.

Juul van Dongen

Co-Founder & CEO

Juul stands for authenticity and honesty: real stories from real entrepreneurs, no polished promises. For years he watched businesses burn their budgets at SEO agencies and get reports back instead of visibility. He co-founded Launchmind so that an entrepreneur's knowledge gets found, authentically and without an agency budget. He personally stands behind it.

Want articles like this for your business?

AI-powered, SEO-optimized content that ranks on Google and gets cited by ChatGPT, Claude & Perplexity.